If you are a chess enthusiast, you might have wondered if it is possible to win a game with only a king left on the board. The answer is yes, but only under very specific circumstances. In this blog post, we will explore the rules and strategies that can help you achieve this rare feat.
First of all, let's clarify what we mean by winning with only a king. We are not talking about checkmating your opponent with your king, which is impossible. We are talking about forcing your opponent to resign or run out of time, while you have no other pieces or pawns besides your king.
The rules of chess state that a game is drawn if either player has insufficient material to checkmate the other. This means that if you have only a king, and your opponent has only a king, or a king and a bishop, or a king and a knight, the game is automatically a draw. However, if your opponent has any other combination of pieces or pawns, the game is not drawn by rule, and you can still try to win.
How can you do that? There are two main ways: stalemate and zugzwang.
Stalemate
A stalemate occurs when the player whose turn it is to move has no legal moves, but is not in check. This results in a draw, unless the player has agreed to resign in such situations. Some chess players consider stalemate to be an unfair outcome, and prefer to concede the game rather than accept a draw. If you are playing against such an opponent, you can try to maneuver your king into a position where it cannot move without getting into check, while avoiding check yourself. This is easier said than done, but it can happen in some endgames where your opponent has pawns that are blocked or isolated.
Black to move is stalemated. Black is not in check but has no legal move since every square to which his king might move is getting into check.
Here are some tips to aim for a stalemate:
- Stay in the Center: Try to keep your king in the center of the board. This reduces the chances of being checkmated and may increase your chances of reaching a stalemate.
- Use the Opponent's Pawns: If your opponent still has pawns, you may be able to position your king in such a way that when they advance, they inadvertently block their own pieces or create a situation where any move would put their king in check, resulting in a stalemate.
- Avoid Corners: Keep your king away from the corners unless absolutely necessary. Corners are the easiest places for an opponent to checkmate a lone king.
- Don't Block Yourself: Be mindful not to move into a position where your own king is blocked by the edge of the board on one side and by the opponent's pieces on the others, leading to a checkmate instead of a stalemate.
Zugzwang
Zugzwang is a situation when the player whose turn it is to move would prefer not to move at all, because any move would worsen their position. In a scenario with only a king left, this is very unlikely to be beneficial, as zugzwang typically involves forcing the opponent to worsen their position, which does not lead to a win for you but could potentially contribute to a stalemate.
To aim for a zugzwang that might lead to a stalemate:
- Force Pawns to Move: If your opponent has pawns, try to get to a position where moving the pawns would either promote them, which cannot be done if it would cause a check to their own king, or would expose their king to check.
- Control Critical Squares: Sometimes, by controlling certain squares, you can force your opponent into moving a piece that would either expose their king or result in no legal moves (stalemate).
- Limited Material: Zugzwang can be most effective when the opponent has limited material and moving any of it would lead to a negative consequence, including the potential for a stalemate.
To illustrate these concepts, let's look at some examples from actual games.
Example 1: Stalemate
This position occurred in a game between Alexander Alekhine and Max Euwe in 1935. Alekhine was playing with the black pieces and had only his king left. Euwe had a rook and a pawn, but could not checkmate Alekhine's king. Alekhine played 1.Kg5!, and Euwe resigned. Why? Because after 2.Rf8 (the only move that does not lose the rook), black plays 2.Kh4!, and white has no legal moves. The rook cannot move without leaving the pawn undefended, and the pawn cannot move without exposing the king to check. This is a stalemate, and a draw by rule. However, Euwe had agreed before the game that he would resign in case of a stalemate, so he honored his word and gave up.
Example 2: Zugzwang
This position occurred in a game between Bent Larsen and Tigran Petrosian in 1966. Larsen was playing with the white pieces and had only his king left. Petrosian had a bishop and two pawns, but could not checkmate Larsen's king. Larsen played 1.Kg3!, and Petrosian resigned. Why? Because white threatens to capture the h-pawn with 2.Kxh3, and black has no good way to prevent it. If black moves the bishop, white captures the h-pawn and then the g-pawn. If black moves the g-pawn, white captures it with 2.Kxg4 and then the h-pawn. If black moves the h-pawn, white captures it with 2.Kxh4 and then the g-pawn. In any case, white ends up with a king and a pawn against a king and a bishop, which is a theoretical draw. Petrosian realized that he had no chance to win, and decided to resign rather than play on.
These examples show that it is possible to win chess with only a king, but only if your opponent cooperates by having more material than necessary, by agreeing to resign in case of stalemate, or by making mistakes that allow you to capture their pawns or pieces. In most cases, however, having only a king is not enough to win chess, and you should try to avoid losing all your other pieces or pawns in the first place.
See more: How to achieve checkmate in 3 moves
Leave a Comment