Marjorie Taylor Greene has ignited a storm of controversy after tweeting about weather manipulation, stating that scientists have the ability to control the weather. The media quickly branded her a conspiracy theorist, but the evidence tells a different story, according to a report by the Gateway Pundit. Greene’s remarks are rooted in a history of documented scientific efforts to modify the weather—an area of research known as geoengineering.
In her now-viral tweet, Greene declared, “Yes they can control the weather,” sparking widespread backlash. However, the mainstream media missed a critical point: Greene didn’t specifically mention hurricanes or large-scale events, but rather, suggested that scientists have long been involved in influencing weather patterns—a claim backed by historical data.
Yes they can control the weather.
It’s ridiculous for anyone to lie and say it can’t be done.
— Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 (@mtgreenee) October 4, 2024
In response to her tweet, a fact-check was attached, stating, “While small-scale ‘cloud seeding’ to create localized rain is possible, hurricanes and other large storms cannot be produced with modern technology.” Interestingly, this so-called correction actually validates Greene’s assertion: scientists can manipulate weather, a fact confirmed by decades of research into weather modification technologies like cloud seeding.
Cloud Seeding and Weather Modification
Cloud seeding is one of the most well-known weather modification techniques, and it has been used globally since the mid-20th century. The process involves dispersing chemicals, such as silver iodide, into the atmosphere to encourage cloud formation and precipitation. According to the USDA, cloud seeding is now an established practice used by governments, insurance companies, and private firms worldwide.
As of last year, there were 42 regular cloud seeding programs across the United States, with an additional 200 stations slated to open soon. The technology has been employed for a variety of purposes, including boosting water supplies for agriculture, preventing hail damage, and even ensuring clear skies for luxury events. For example, a British company offers cloud seeding services for couples looking to guarantee fair weather on their wedding day.
Government Involvement and Military Applications
The U.S. government has a long history of using weather modification for military purposes. During the Vietnam War, the U.S. Department of Defense initiated Operation Popeye, a classified project that used cloud seeding to extend the monsoon season and disrupt enemy supply routes. The program, which took place from 1967 to 1972, was declassified years later, revealing that weather manipulation had been weaponized to flood roads and cripple infrastructure.
Even earlier, in 1947, the U.S. government attempted to modify a hurricane as part of Project Cirrus. The project involved dropping dry ice into the clouds of a hurricane off the coast of Florida in an effort to alter its path. Instead of dissipating, the storm veered sharply, striking the coast of Georgia and causing millions in damages. Lawsuits followed, and the project was deemed a failure, but it demonstrated the potential—and danger—of manipulating large weather systems.
Geoengineering and Climate Control
Today, geoengineering goes beyond cloud seeding and encompasses a range of technologies designed to modify weather and climate systems. The U.S. government is currently engaged in a five-year geoengineering study, exploring how these technologies can be used to combat climate change. These efforts include everything from cloud seeding to more experimental techniques, such as deploying aerosols to reflect sunlight and reduce global warming.
However, geoengineering raises serious ethical and safety concerns. Robert Kennedy, Jr. has been a vocal critic, accusing figures like Bill Gates of hijacking the field to push for greater social control under the guise of climate solutions. “They aggravate the problem, then sell us the solution,” Kennedy has said, warning of the potential dangers posed by unregulated weather modification.
Global Use of Weather Control Technologies
Weather modification is not limited to the United States. Over 52 countries are currently engaged in weather control programs, including China, Russia, India, and Israel. China, in particular, has been aggressively expanding its weather modification efforts, aiming to alter weather over half of its territory by 2025. During the 2008 Beijing Olympics, China famously used cloud seeding to ensure clear skies for the event.
The use of geoengineering by foreign governments has raised concerns about the potential for weather manipulation to be used as a weapon. During the Cold War, the U.S. and the Soviet Union both explored the idea of using weather control to disrupt each other’s agriculture and infrastructure. More recently, Iran has accused Israel and Turkey of “stealing its rain” through cloud seeding, exacerbating drought conditions in the region.
Health and Environmental Concerns
While cloud seeding and other weather modification techniques can provide tangible benefits, they also carry risks. Silver iodide, one of the chemicals commonly used in cloud seeding, has been linked to health issues, including respiratory problems and environmental contamination. Although the Weather Modification Association claims that silver iodide is safe, environmentalists remain concerned about the long-term impacts of its use on soil and water sources.
Moreover, the lack of public oversight and regulation surrounding weather modification has allowed private companies and governments to experiment with these technologies with little accountability. According to the American Bar Association, weather modification is largely unregulated in the United States, and there has been little to no public discourse on the ethical implications of these practices.
The Future of Weather Control
As weather modification technologies continue to evolve, the potential for both positive and negative outcomes grows. Proponents argue that geoengineering could be a valuable tool in the fight against climate change, while critics warn that it could be used for nefarious purposes or cause unintended consequences.
Marjorie Taylor Greene’s tweet has reignited a much-needed conversation about weather manipulation, challenging the public to consider the implications of geoengineering and the role it plays in modern society. With more governments and private entities investing in these technologies, the question remains: Are we prepared for the consequences of controlling the weather?
To explore the world of weather modification further, visit this comprehensive resource.
As the debate over weather control continues, it is clear that the topic is no longer a fringe issue, but a reality with far-reaching implications for the environment, public health, and global politics.
SOURCE
WATCH THESE COMPREHENSIVE DOCUMENTARIES FOR IN DEPTH INFORMATION:
Leave a Comment